Corrective Maintenance Odoo 18
By Braincuber Team
Published on December 29, 2025
Manufacturing facility managing production equipment creates reactive maintenance chaos: drill station breaking mid-shift causing 8-hour production halt because no corrective maintenance request system forcing manual paper notes technician assignments, no failure tracking showing drill used 6 months straight without issues then failing three times one week unable identifying reliability degradation patterns, MTBF calculation impossible manually counting days between failures across 50 machines preventing prediction when equipment likely failing next, emergency repairs averaging 12 hours versus industry standard 4 hours because technicians unaware equipment history previous fixes parts needed, and no warranty tracking discovering failed compressor under warranty after paying 8K repair when manufacturer would covered free—generating extended downtimes excessive repair costs missed warranty savings unpredictable failures and inability forecasting equipment replacement needs from reactive fire-fighting maintenance without systematic corrective maintenance tracking failure analysis MTBF calculation and repair history management.
Odoo 18 Corrective Maintenance enables efficient breakdown response through unscheduled maintenance requests created when equipment fails, failure documentation recording breakdown dates causes technician actions, automatic MTBF calculation computing mean time between failures across equipment lifecycle, estimated next failure prediction calculating when equipment likely failing based historical patterns, equipment repair tracking logging corrective actions parts costs technicians, maintenance stage workflow managing New Request In Progress Repaired states, vendor warranty integration linking equipment to purchase warranty dates, priority assignment flagging critical urgent failures requiring immediate attention, technician assignment routing requests to specialized maintenance staff, and product information storage maintaining vendor references model numbers serial numbers—reducing equipment downtime 60 percent through faster failure response lowering repair costs 40 percent via historical knowledge preventing repeat failures through pattern analysis enabling replacement planning through MTBF trends and maximizing warranty claims through expiration tracking achieving operational continuity cost control asset longevity through systematic corrective maintenance management.
Corrective Features: Unscheduled requests, Failure documentation, MTBF calculation, Next failure prediction, Repair tracking, Stage workflow, Warranty integration, Priority assignment, Technician assignment, Product information storage
Corrective vs Preventive Maintenance
Understanding maintenance approaches:
Key Differences:
| Aspect | Corrective Maintenance | Preventive Maintenance |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Equipment failure breakdown | Scheduled calendar or usage |
| Planning | Unscheduled reactive | Planned proactive |
| Purpose | Repair restore function | Prevent failures |
| Recurrence | One-time per failure | Recurring intervals |
| Impact | Unplanned downtime | Scheduled minimal disruption |
| Cost | Higher emergency repairs | Lower routine maintenance |
Corrective Maintenance Benefits:
Reduced Initial Costs
No regular inspections needed
Fast Restoration
Quick problem resolution
Simple Management
Act only when needed
Non-Critical Equipment
Cost-effective for backups
Full Equipment Use
Run until failure
No Over-Maintenance
Avoid unnecessary work
Equipment Setup
Configuring equipment for corrective maintenance:
Creating Equipment:
- Go to Maintenance → Equipment → Machines and Tools
- Click New
- Fill equipment details
General Information:
Example: Drill Machine
- Equipment Name: Drill Machine
- Category: Furniture Tools (or appropriate category)
- Used By: Department Employee or Others
- Maintenance Team: Production Maintenance Team
- Technician: Assigned maintenance technician
- Used in Location: Workshop Floor 1
- Work Center: If part of production (optional)
Product Information Tab:
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor Name | Equipment supplier | Industrial Tools Co |
| Vendor Reference | Supplier product code | DM-2024-X500 |
| Model | Equipment model number | ProDrill X500 |
| Serial Number | Unique identifier | SN-87654321 |
| Effective Date | When equipment became operational | 07/01/2025 |
| Warranty Expiration | Warranty end date | 07/01/2027 |
| Cost | Purchase price | 15000 dollars |
Maintenance Tab Configuration
MTBF Settings:
Expected Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF):
Enter expected days between failures based on:
- Manufacturer specifications
- Industry benchmarks for equipment type
- Historical data from similar equipment
- Operating conditions and usage intensity
Example: Expected MTBF = 30 days
Auto-Calculated Fields:
After corrective maintenance requests completed:
- Mean Time Between Failures: Auto-calculated from actual failure dates
- Latest Failure: Date of most recent corrective maintenance
- Estimated Next Failure: Latest Failure + Expected MTBF
- Mean Time to Repair: Average repair duration
Creating Corrective Maintenance Request
Request Creation:
- Go to Maintenance → Maintenance → Maintenance Requests
- Click New
- Fill request form
Request Configuration:
- Description: Check the Equipment or specific issue e.g. Drill Motor Not Starting
- Created By: Employee reporting issue
- For Equipment: Drill Machine (select from dropdown)
- Requested Date: When issue reported (auto-fills current date)
- Team: Maintenance team responsible
- Responsible Person: Technician assigned
- Scheduled Date: When maintenance scheduled
- Duration: Estimated repair time hours
- Priority:
- Low: Non-critical can wait
- Normal: Standard priority
- High: Important address soon
- Very High: Critical production impact
- Company: Company owning equipment
- Maintenance Type: Corrective (critical selection)
Corrective vs Preventive: Selecting Corrective maintenance type indicates reactive repair after failure. No recurrence options appear since corrective maintenance is one-time per failure not scheduled recurring like preventive maintenance.
Maintenance Request Workflow
Stage Progression:
New Request
Initial state when request created. Awaiting technician assignment or scheduling.
In Progress
Technician actively working on repair. Equipment may be down or under service.
Repaired
Maintenance completed. Equipment restored to operation. MTBF calculations updated.
Stage Management:
- Request created in New Request stage
- Technician starts work:
- Drag request to In Progress in Kanban view or
- Change stage dropdown in form view
- After repair completion move to Repaired
- System automatically updates equipment MTBF data
MTBF Calculation
Automatic failure analysis:
Calculation Formula:
Mean Time Between Failures:
MTBF = Total Operating Days / Number of Failures
Example Calculation:
- Effective Date: 07/01/2025 (equipment operational)
- Latest Failure: 07/28/2025 (corrective request date)
- Days Between: 27 days
- Number of Failures: 1
MTBF = 27 days / 1 failure = 27 days
Estimated Next Failure:
Next Failure = Latest Failure + Expected MTBF Next Failure = 07/28/2025 + 30 days = 08/27/2025
Multiple Failures Example:
Scenario: Equipment with three failures
- Effective Date: 01/01/2025
- Failure 1: 01/15/2025 (14 days)
- Failure 2: 02/10/2025 (26 days from failure 1)
- Failure 3: 03/05/2025 (23 days from failure 2)
- Total Days: 63 days (01/01 to 03/05)
- Number of Failures: 3
MTBF = 63 days / 3 failures = 21 days average
This indicates equipment failing approximately every 21 days requiring preventive maintenance implementation or replacement consideration.
Viewing Updated Equipment Data
After Completing Maintenance:
- Return to equipment record (Drill Machine)
- Open Maintenance tab
- View updated fields:
- Mean Time Between Failures: Calculated from actual data
- Latest Failure: Date of most recent corrective request
- Estimated Next Failure: Predicted next breakdown
- Mean Time to Repair: Average repair duration
Equipment Maintenance Smart Button:
Click Maintenance smart button on equipment showing:
- All corrective maintenance requests for equipment
- All preventive maintenance requests
- Request dates statuses technicians
- Complete maintenance history
Warranty Management
Warranty Tracking:
Maximizing warranty claims:
- Enter Warranty Expiration Date in equipment product information
- Before creating corrective maintenance check current date versus warranty
- If under warranty:
- Contact vendor for warranty repair
- Document warranty claim in maintenance notes
- Avoid unnecessary costs
- System shows warranty status in equipment form
Priority Management
Priority Guidelines:
| Priority | Use When | Response Time |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Non-critical equipment backup available | 1-2 weeks |
| Normal | Standard equipment moderate impact | 2-5 days |
| High | Important equipment production affected | Same day |
| Very High | Critical equipment production stopped | Immediate 1-2 hours |
Best Practices
Document Detailed Failure Descriptions Enabling Faster Future Repairs: Vague description Check the Equipment equals technician investigating 2 hours identifying motor bearing failure. Detailed description Drill Motor Not Starting Burning Smell from Motor Housing equals technician immediately knowing motor failure bringing correct parts completing repair 30 minutes. Comprehensive descriptions reduce diagnostic time preventing repeat investigation.
Monitor MTBF Trends Identifying Equipment Requiring Preventive Maintenance or Replacement: Equipment showing MTBF decreasing from 90 days to 60 days to 30 days equals reliability degradation warranting preventive maintenance implementation or replacement consideration. Stable low MTBF 10 days indicates chronic unreliability requiring immediate replacement. Tracking MTBF enables data-driven maintenance strategy decisions asset lifecycle planning.
Set Realistic Expected MTBF Based on Manufacturer Specs Not Optimistic Guesses: Setting Expected MTBF 365 days when manufacturer specifies 180 days equals inaccurate predictions. Estimated Next Failure calculations misleading causing unpreparedness for breakdown. Use manufacturer specifications industry benchmarks or historical data from similar equipment. Accurate expectations enable reliable failure forecasting proper maintenance planning.
Conclusion
Odoo 18 Corrective Maintenance enables efficient breakdown response through unscheduled maintenance requests failure documentation automatic MTBF calculation estimated next failure prediction equipment repair tracking maintenance stage workflow vendor warranty integration priority assignment technician assignment and product information storage. Reduce equipment downtime through faster failure response lowering repair costs via historical knowledge preventing repeat failures through pattern analysis enabling replacement planning through MTBF trends maximizing warranty claims through expiration tracking achieving operational continuity cost control asset longevity regulatory compliance and data-driven maintenance strategy through systematic corrective maintenance management supporting informed asset lifecycle decisions and minimizing unplanned production disruptions.
